Backwards compatibility takes us … backwards

Unfortunately, once you keep support for old, vulnerable versions of your software, people will continue to use old, vulnerable versions of your software.

Vendors shrugged their shoulders, and pundits blamed software users for choosing to use a working-but-vulnerable version instead of a broken-but-patched version (as if that was a real choice). And as more users continued to use the vulnerable features, vendors had to continue to support the vulnerable versions, which enabled more users to rely on the vulnerable features, which … you get the picture.

Software has mostly stopped being single purpose, where a vendor can understand exactly how their customers will use it. Instead, it’s become general purpose, with most software doing very simple things well, but being used in highly unpredictable ways. And no longer does an IT team even install most software, because most organizations are no longer “metal-native” — owning their own computer systems — but are instead cloud-native, SaaS-native, and AI-native.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore More

Why AI is the final missing piece of the CNAPP puzzle

Cloud security teams are facing a growing number of risks due to the complex and dynamic nature of cloud environments. Prioritizing and remediating these vulnerabilities and misconfigurations before threat actors

Global data breach costs hit all-time high

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Global data breach costs have hit an all-time high, according to IBM’s annual Cost of a Data Breach report. The tech giant collaborated with the Ponemon institute to

How platformization is transforming cyber security

With more than 15 years of experience in cyber security, Manuel Rodriguez is currently the Security Engineering Manager for the North of Latin America at Check Point Software Technologies, where